It has been clear for ages that DaimlerChrysler wanted to save its troubled Smart city car brand. Bosses reckoned total sales of 770,000 cars in eight years showed the original concept was right, and with the world growing daily more conscious of car congestion and pollution, the future for a right-sized Smart operation might even be bright.
That’s why bosses summarily dumped the slow-selling Roadster and Forfour, slashed costs at the Hambach plant (by halving the workforce), devised a plan to sell the car in the US and set a crack team to work correcting the dynamic shortcomings of Smart's core model, the Fortwo. This is the fruit of that team's labour – the second-generation Smart Fortwo. So is it a brand-saver?
What's it like?
The list of the original Smart car's faults is short but fundamental. It needed big improvements to steering, ride, handling and motorway stability. It needed more accessible performance and something better than a painfully-slow clutchless gearchange. It also needed better quality materials, especially inside. What it didn’t need was the basic concept to be messed with: owners loved that.
For 2007, engineers have attacked every fault on that list. Using a similar basic structure (lengthened 20cm, mostly in the front overhang), they have made the coupe comply with forthcoming US and European crash regulations. They have radically improved the suspension, increasing the tyre sizes, tracks (by 30mm) and wheelbase (by 60mm), and they have replaced the small, expensive-to-produce 700cc three-cylinder petrol turbo engine with a Mitsubishi-sourced 1.0-litre unit available in three power levels (normally-aspirated 61bhp and 71bhp, plus turbocharged 84bhp tune). Smart has also upgraded the ultra-frugal 45bhp 800cc turbodiesel motor.