Currently reading: Volkswagen Golf GTI vs Hyundai i30 N: which is our favourite hot hatch?
Our long-term test fleet’s two white-hot hatches go head to head to see whether Volkswagen still makes the best all-rounder or Hyundai has topped it at its first attempt

Hot hatchbacks are a regular sight on the Autocar long-term test fleet. There’s little else that can balance power, practicality and cost as well as the humble family car once a manufacturer has given it a performance-minded overhaul, and we love them for it.

The category is dominated by familiar makes and models, though, so it’s rare we get the opportunity to run a manufacturer’s first attempt at a hot hatch. But that’s exactly what happened when we took delivery of a Hyundai i30 N to our test fleet at the beginning of the year, not long after it had earned an admirable three and a half stars in an Autocar road test

Better yet, it arrived while we were running the latest version of the car that first popularised hot hatches back in 1976. The Volkswagen Golf GTI is a consummate all-rounder and as compelling here in its seventh generation as it has ever been.

The big question, then, is whether Hyundai has managed to best Volkswagen at its own game at the first attempt of trying or the GTI is still the car you’d want to live with. This naturally caused great debate in the office, so we’ve left it to news editor and i30 N minder Rachel Burgess and Golf GTI-running editor Mark Tisshaw to argue it out.

Golf gti vs hyundai i30n

RB: Do you reckon the GTI still rules the hot hatch roost, then?

MT: Now there’s an opener… The GTI is unique, not in the clichéd sense, but because nothing else has really replicated its formula, the i30 N included. You’d be mad to launch a new hot hatch with the GTI’s low power figure, but its appeal has always been in its all-round usability.

RB: I’ve always had a soft spot for the GTI. Still, the arrival of a new hot hatch is rare, so it’s been great to have a few months to really get to grips with the i30 N. It isn’t as well-rounded as the GTI, granted, but that very reason sometimes means it’s more exciting.

Hyundai i30n longterm review rachel driving

Back to top

MT: What’s best about the i30 N is its chassis. It’s clear where the development budget has gone, which is the right place to spend it on a hot hatch. It feels a bit like the previous Honda Civic Type R to that end: fast and focused, but with a bit of explaining to do as a daily driver.

RB: The chassis is probably one of the biggest criticisms the car’s received, in terms of its overly harsh ride. And when I jumped back in the i30 N having spent some time in the GTI, I can’t argue there was a stark difference. The many speed bumps in my suburban road were felt quite a lot more. But, actually, once you’re accustomed to it, it’s a very usable daily car.

MT: I wonder if in part that harsher ride also comes from its heavier weight. You really notice the extra weight in the i30 N, and that’s why its extra power is needed. When you’re up to speed, the GTI feels the faster car because it’s more agile. At our handling day last year, the GTI only gave away 0.3sec to the i30 N over a lap at Castle Combe – a fast track where power tends to have more of an advantage. Which shows just how quick the GTI is when you look beyond the headline figures.

RB: Most people love to pigeonhole cars, typically by performance, and in performance and headline figures terms the GTI ranks bottom. It gives away loads of power. Yet the power it has is so usable. It just feels like the right amount for a car of its size and weight.

MT: I know you’ve wished for a bit more low-end torque in the i30 N, but for me, that was a real strength of the car. It’s a very strong engine, very tractable, and feels a performance level up from the GTI.

RB: The torque in the GTI is definitely more linear than the i30 N. While I’d like a little more shove at a roundabout in the Hyundai, the mid-rev-range acceleration is actually more surprising and exciting for that very reason. Getting it up to motorway speeds from a slip road is real fun, especially with that distinctive exhaust note, which is much punchy than the GTI’s.

MT: I’d agree that the i30 N sounds much more like a hot hatch should.

Back to top

I30 n9647

RB: I also much prefer the gearchanges in the i30 N. I can’t deny that the GTI’s are smooth and the longer ratio in first is better. But the i30 N has accurate, swift changes that are incredibly satisfying in this type of car.

MT: Which again shows where Hyundai has spent the budget – on the ‘hot’ part of the hot hatch formula. For me, a good example of the differences between the two cars is how the steering wheel feels in your hands. The GTI's just nestles in your palms and is a lovely grippy material, while the i30 N’s seems somewhat cheap. There’s not much to tell an N from any other i30 inside, too, which is a shame when the GTI nails it over a standard Volkswagen Golf with those seats and that gearknob.

RB: It’s true – the GTI stands out far more than the i30 N inside. The cabin differences between the two hot hatches were what I noticed first. The GTI has manual seat movements, the i30 N automatic; the GTI has a traditional key start, the i30 N a keyless start. Where Volkswagen has respected the GTI’s heritage with its interior, the new i30 N has instead opted for convenience. The i30 N is nevertheless the clear winner in one important aspect: its good old-fashioned manual handbrake lever. Much more satisfying than the GTI’s electronic one.

MT: What’s worth repeating again about the i30 N is just what a stunning achievement the car is, as Hyundai’s first hot hatch. The firm did not set out to build the world’s best hot hatch and instead spent the cash on making one with a competitive powertrain and chassis. But I’d still rather have the GTI.

Back to top

RB: I agree, the GTI is the more obvious choice, but the i30 N’s character makes it the more exciting pick out of the two. And it’s almost £4k cheaper than your Golf GTI when you’ve added all the options.

Golf 3983

Volkswagen Golf GTI 2.0 TSI 230 specification

Price as tested £32,520 Options Onyx White Premium Signature paint (£990), Seville Dark Graphite alloys (£495), Dynamic Chassis Control (£830), climate windscreen (£295), Discover Navigation Pro (£1325), rear view camera (£265) Engine 4cyls, 1984cc, turbocharged petrol Power 226bhp at 4700-6200rpm Torque 258lb ft at 1500-4600­rpm Top speed 155mph 0-62mph 6.4sec Claimed fuel economy 44.1mpg Test fuel economy 34.2mpg CO2 148g/km

Hyundai i30 N specification

Price as tested: £28,580 Options: Clean Slate paint £585 Engine 1998cc, turbocharged petrol Power 271bhp at 6000rpm Torque 260lb ft at 1450-4000rpm Top speed 155mph 0-62mph 6.1sec Claimed fuel economy 39.7mpg Test fuel economy 28.0mpg CO2 163g/km

Golf 3981

Join the debate

Comments
7
Add a comment…
HowdyFolks 18 June 2018

More discount available on the VW

The Hyundai is too new to get much off with a broker at the moment, but nearly 5k discount at Broadspeed on the VW could make a big difference.

Also it's a shame Autocar can't resist adding mostly unnecessary options. The most expensive paint, dark wheels, and a tarted up nav? Seriously? Without those the pricing might well affect choice and they won't make much difference come resale.

yvesferrer 16 June 2018

Where is the meat?

Two journos having a love-in discussion? Is that the new format for comparisons between cars?

While we are at it: videos are great! Super! and INSTANTLY FORGETTABLE!

How about some more boring, old-fashioned text with facts and figures aplenty AS WELL?

It seems that The AUTOCAR is following a trend set by some racing sites but this is not necessarily a good thing: by nature, racing is ephemeral; people buy cars that they keep years... different worlds!

Jon 1972 15 June 2018

Always fun to see an article

Always fun to see an article about the GTI because you know that no matter what the verdict, it's the car the journalists are more likely to buy with their rather than your money.

 

As for Hyundai, it failed my crucial ownership test in that the longer I owned it the less l liked it - I never had a car with more problems from failed reversing cameras, faulty clutch, wheel bearing failed at 19k not to mention all the poorly thought out guys like a boot that dumped water onto your head when it opened.